 |
|
 |
|
Next: Honor Harrington Wiki?
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Aug 13, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 31) Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 6:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>books>david-weber (more info?)
|
|
|
"Fred Burton" <fburton.RemoveThis@starfire.mv.com> wrote in message
news:einquf$1b2h$1@pyrite.mv.net...
>
> wendal wrote in message
> <1162778266.536691.104280.RemoveThis@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
>>
>>Fred Burton wrote:
>>> Offbreed wrote in message ...
>>> >Fred Burton wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I think that some sort of fragmentation of the League is coming.
> While I
>>> >> can see Mesa/Manpower infiltrating and controlling big chunks of the
>>> League
>>> >> like puppets, I can see some parts of the League seeing thru this
>>> >> manipulation and breaking away, perhaps allying themselves with
> whatever
>>> >> anti-Mesa/Manpower alliance ends up being formed.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >I think that Mesa's penetration of assorted parts of the League is
>>> >going
>>> >to be a factor increasing the fragmentation of the League.
>>> >
>>> >People who have sold out to someone outside their company (or nation)
>>> >are not going to defend their group. Why should they? Their emotionally
>>> >important source of income is from someone outside, and whatever group
>>> >they are betraying has proven it's self to be weak and unable to defend
>>> >it's self, plus whatever justifications the sell out makes for selling
> out.
>>> >
>>> >Mesa has systematically introduced such flaws where there needs to be
>>> >strength.
>>>
>>> And add to that the fact that the League's political setup may be OK in
>>> a
>>> situation where there are no real outside threats.
>>> However, that setup does seem extremely vulnerable to some force that
>>> may
> be
>>> intentionally trying to fracture it from the inside,
>>> particularly when there's an apparant external threat. The lack of a
> strong
>>> central government and an apparant political tradition
>>> against one seems to make the League vulnerable to any force which may
>>> covertly try to set League member planets against each other.
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems as if Mesa's strategy will be to force a breakup of the League,
> to
>>> have a number of warlord governors of various sectors
>>> in their pocket, and to eventually try to gain control over much of the
>>> League thru those warlord governors.
>
>
>>I don't know that mesa goals are that lofty. They may just be seeking
>>to have their own piece were they can do whatever they damn well please
>>
>
> But if their own goal was to create their own empire from something new,
> why
> hadn't they already gone into the Talbot sector,
> for example, and tried to take over that very underdeveloped region?
> Mesa/Manpower seems far too involved in covert operations
> in various governments and regions for merely gathering information.
>
> For example, their actions keeping the Manties and Haven fighting each
> other
> seems designed to weaken both so that
> neither can oppose Mesa at some later date.
>
> Also, Mesa seems to be trying to get its hooks into so many different
> places, that it's hard to imagine that they're not trying to
> create trouble in those places for their own benefit. And I find it hard
> to
> imagine that all that covert work would be for the benefit
> of setting up a new Mesan empire somewhere else.
The data makes it clear that Mesans moved to new space from Beowulf and set
up. If they had wanted to forge their own Empire in unihabited space they
could have and should have done it back about the time their people were
killing the founder of the Mancticore navy.
This would have been the obvious ploy to me.
They seem to want to take over as the ruling elite in human space with the
sub men serving them but I still have the feeling that they have to rule the
sub men by pure fear.
>
> No, I think that the Mesans do have lofty and mysterious goals. Also,
> from
> a more practical perspective, I don't think that DW would
> be putting so much effort into developing the Mesans as new and mysterious
> bad guys if their goals weren't lofty and would impact
> the known Honorverse, as we already known it. I'm hard pressed to believe
> that all this effort (on both DW's and the Mesan's part)
> would be put into merely stirring up the pot to keep things unstable so
> that
> Mesa/Manpower could merely make more money.
> I firmly believe that there's something much, much larger behind all this.
>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 13, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 32) Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"wendal" <aehoppy.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162844114.931909.244890@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> Fred Burton wrote:
>> wendal wrote in message
>> <1162778266.536691.104280.TakeThisOut@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
>> >
>> >Fred Burton wrote:
>> >> Offbreed wrote in message ...
>> >> >Fred Burton wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I think that some sort of fragmentation of the League is coming.
>> While I
>> >> >> can see Mesa/Manpower infiltrating and controlling big chunks of
>> >> >> the
>> >> League
>> >> >> like puppets, I can see some parts of the League seeing thru this
>> >> >> manipulation and breaking away, perhaps allying themselves with
>> whatever
>> >> >> anti-Mesa/Manpower alliance ends up being formed.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >I think that Mesa's penetration of assorted parts of the League is
>> >> >going
>> >> >to be a factor increasing the fragmentation of the League.
>> >> >
>> >> >People who have sold out to someone outside their company (or nation)
>> >> >are not going to defend their group. Why should they? Their
>> >> >emotionally
>> >> >important source of income is from someone outside, and whatever
>> >> >group
>> >> >they are betraying has proven it's self to be weak and unable to
>> >> >defend
>> >> >it's self, plus whatever justifications the sell out makes for
>> >> >selling
>> out.
>> >> >
>> >> >Mesa has systematically introduced such flaws where there needs to be
>> >> >strength.
>> >>
>> >> And add to that the fact that the League's political setup may be OK
>> >> in a
>> >> situation where there are no real outside threats.
>> >> However, that setup does seem extremely vulnerable to some force that
>> >> may
>> be
>> >> intentionally trying to fracture it from the inside,
>> >> particularly when there's an apparant external threat. The lack of a
>> strong
>> >> central government and an apparant political tradition
>> >> against one seems to make the League vulnerable to any force which may
>> >> covertly try to set League member planets against each other.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> It seems as if Mesa's strategy will be to force a breakup of the
>> >> League,
>> to
>> >> have a number of warlord governors of various sectors
>> >> in their pocket, and to eventually try to gain control over much of
>> >> the
>> >> League thru those warlord governors.
>>
>>
>> >I don't know that mesa goals are that lofty. They may just be seeking
>> >to have their own piece were they can do whatever they damn well please
>> >
>>
>> But if their own goal was to create their own empire from something new,
>> why
>> hadn't they already gone into the Talbot sector,
>> for example, and tried to take over that very underdeveloped region?
>> Mesa/Manpower seems far too involved in covert operations
>> in various governments and regions for merely gathering information.
>>
>> For example, their actions keeping the Manties and Haven fighting each
>> other
>> seems designed to weaken both so that
>> neither can oppose Mesa at some later date.
>>
>> Also, Mesa seems to be trying to get its hooks into so many different
>> places, that it's hard to imagine that they're not trying to
>> create trouble in those places for their own benefit. And I find it hard
>> to
>> imagine that all that covert work would be for the benefit
>> of setting up a new Mesan empire somewhere else.
>>
>> No, I think that the Mesans do have lofty and mysterious goals. Also,
>> from
>> a more practical perspective, I don't think that DW would
>> be putting so much effort into developing the Mesans as new and
>> mysterious
>> bad guys if their goals weren't lofty and would impact
>> the known Honorverse, as we already known it. I'm hard pressed to
>> believe
>> that all this effort (on both DW's and the Mesan's part)
>> would be put into merely stirring up the pot to keep things unstable so
>> that
>> Mesa/Manpower could merely make more money.
>> I firmly believe that there's something much, much larger behind all
>> this.
> maybe ambitious is better word the lofty. I see their primary goals as
> being the conversion of as many surrounding systems as possible to
> their master/slave+better living though genetics ideology so as to
> buffer themselves from the rest of the galaxy at large they realize
> that as one planet their a bug but if they can represent themselves as
> culture or way of life much of which is part of the league they can't
> be just stepped on. destroying the league I think is not part of their
> plans if only because most of their power is within and dependent on
> the league and breakup would hurt as much as help them and present
> allot of smaller and more agile opponents than league they face today.
> as to their role in the havenite-manty war I think they see as a
> stalling and weakening tactic against to enemies that can't be traced
> back to them. as I've said before they seem rather optimistic in
> their culvert ops cutouts, possibly caused by the forgiving atmosphere
> in the league.
>
Traditionally their friends and allies in the League could act to protect
them from any uncouth barbarians they might happen to offend while
preventing the League itself from acting against them. This view is more
questionable now. >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 22, 2006 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 33) Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Fred Burton" <fburton.RemoveThis@starfire.mv.com> wrote in message
news:einquf$1b2h$1@pyrite.mv.net...
>
> wendal wrote in message
> <1162778266.536691.104280.RemoveThis@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
>>
>>Fred Burton wrote:
>>> Offbreed wrote in message ...
>>> >Fred Burton wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I think that some sort of fragmentation of the League is coming.
> While I
>>> >> can see Mesa/Manpower infiltrating and controlling big chunks of the
>>> League
>>> >> like puppets, I can see some parts of the League seeing thru this
>>> >> manipulation and breaking away, perhaps allying themselves with
> whatever
>>> >> anti-Mesa/Manpower alliance ends up being formed.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >I think that Mesa's penetration of assorted parts of the League is
>>> >going
>>> >to be a factor increasing the fragmentation of the League.
>>> >
>>> >People who have sold out to someone outside their company (or nation)
>>> >are not going to defend their group. Why should they? Their emotionally
>>> >important source of income is from someone outside, and whatever group
>>> >they are betraying has proven it's self to be weak and unable to defend
>>> >it's self, plus whatever justifications the sell out makes for selling
> out.
>>> >
>>> >Mesa has systematically introduced such flaws where there needs to be
>>> >strength.
>>>
>>> And add to that the fact that the League's political setup may be OK in
>>> a
>>> situation where there are no real outside threats.
>>> However, that setup does seem extremely vulnerable to some force that
>>> may
> be
>>> intentionally trying to fracture it from the inside,
>>> particularly when there's an apparant external threat. The lack of a
> strong
>>> central government and an apparant political tradition
>>> against one seems to make the League vulnerable to any force which may
>>> covertly try to set League member planets against each other.
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems as if Mesa's strategy will be to force a breakup of the League,
> to
>>> have a number of warlord governors of various sectors
>>> in their pocket, and to eventually try to gain control over much of the
>>> League thru those warlord governors.
>
>
>>I don't know that mesa goals are that lofty. They may just be seeking
>>to have their own piece were they can do whatever they damn well please
>>
>
> But if their own goal was to create their own empire from something new,
> why
> hadn't they already gone into the Talbot sector,
> for example, and tried to take over that very underdeveloped region?
> Mesa/Manpower seems far too involved in covert operations
> in various governments and regions for merely gathering information.
They remember the backlash after the war involving genetic constructs (I
don't have the books at hand), and how massed humanity was able to crush
them. So they are working as subtly as possible in order that they not be
seen as a threat by the bulk of the galaxy.
>
> For example, their actions keeping the Manties and Haven fighting each
> other
> seems designed to weaken both so that
> neither can oppose Mesa at some later date.
>
> Also, Mesa seems to be trying to get its hooks into so many different
> places, that it's hard to imagine that they're not trying to
> create trouble in those places for their own benefit. And I find it hard
> to
> imagine that all that covert work would be for the benefit
> of setting up a new Mesan empire somewhere else.
>
> No, I think that the Mesans do have lofty and mysterious goals. Also,
> from
> a more practical perspective, I don't think that DW would
> be putting so much effort into developing the Mesans as new and mysterious
> bad guys if their goals weren't lofty and would impact
> the known Honorverse, as we already known it. I'm hard pressed to believe
> that all this effort (on both DW's and the Mesan's part)
> would be put into merely stirring up the pot to keep things unstable so
> that
> Mesa/Manpower could merely make more money.
> I firmly believe that there's something much, much larger behind all this.
>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 25, 2004 Posts: 440
|
(Msg. 34) Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:01 am
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Offbreed wrote:
> John Palmer wrote:
>
>
>> Two responses, first is given how undeveloped most of the planet is,
>> and how
>> dangerous the planet's surface is reputed to be, couldn't the treecats
>> disappear
>> into the "brush"?
>
> Likely they could.
>
That's pretty much what they did on Sphinx for quite a while,
successfully hiding there mere existence from space-faring humans for
quite a while. I'm not sure how widespread the knowledge of their
ability to see Infrared light is though.
--
--Jeffrey MacHott
"Sola bona lingua est mortua lingua" >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 22, 2006 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 35) Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jeffrey MacHott" <Raguleader RemoveThis @netzero.net> wrote in message
news:XiV3h.284843$aI2.223542@fe06.news.easynews.com...
> Offbreed wrote:
>> John Palmer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Two responses, first is given how undeveloped most of the planet is, and
>>> how
>>> dangerous the planet's surface is reputed to be, couldn't the treecats
>>> disappear
>>> into the "brush"?
>>
>> Likely they could.
>>
>
> That's pretty much what they did on Sphinx for quite a while, successfully
> hiding there mere existence from space-faring humans for quite a while.
> I'm not sure how widespread the knowledge of their ability to see Infrared
> light is though.
>
Although on Sphinx they were "disappearing" into their native habitat, where
they were familiar with the conditions and could eat their ecological
neighbors without problem. Doing the same on a different planet would be
problematic to impossible because of biochemical differences, lacking
micronutrients, or toxic substances. The Graysonites needed severe
techonological intervention just to cut the death rate to 75% (or whatever)
from 100%. Taking to the bush without extensive preparation by genetic
manipulation to adapt to the new environment would not work unless the
planet were essentially identical to the homeworld.
gS >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 36) Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"gS49" <gersmith00 RemoveThis @verizon.net> wrote in message
news:vD04h.1250$2X4.535@trnddc04...
>
> "Jeffrey MacHott" <Raguleader RemoveThis @netzero.net> wrote in message
> news:XiV3h.284843$aI2.223542@fe06.news.easynews.com...
>> Offbreed wrote:
>>> John Palmer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Two responses, first is given how undeveloped most of the planet is,
>>>> and how
>>>> dangerous the planet's surface is reputed to be, couldn't the treecats
>>>> disappear
>>>> into the "brush"?
>>>
>>> Likely they could.
>>>
>>
>> That's pretty much what they did on Sphinx for quite a while,
>> successfully hiding there mere existence from space-faring humans for
>> quite a while. I'm not sure how widespread the knowledge of their ability
>> to see Infrared light is though.
>>
>
> Although on Sphinx they were "disappearing" into their native habitat,
> where they were familiar with the conditions and could eat their
> ecological neighbors without problem. Doing the same on a different
> planet would be problematic to impossible because of biochemical
> differences, lacking micronutrients, or toxic substances. The Graysonites
> needed severe techonological intervention just to cut the death rate to
> 75% (or whatever) from 100%. Taking to the bush without extensive
> preparation by genetic manipulation to adapt to the new environment would
> not work unless the planet were essentially identical to the homeworld.
>
> gS
>
>
By the way, if we're talking about Hades, it was established that Humans
could not eat the native plant life (or animal life). Since Treecats are
able to eat Human food, it's very likely that Treecats could not eat the
Hades plants or animals.
I'd note that it is possible that there will be enough similarity between
other worlds' plants and animals that Humans *could* eat those plants and
animals. We just haven't surveyed enough alien ecologies to know for sure.
--
*
Paul Howard
*
New e-mail: drakbibliophile at yahoo.com
*
Drak Bibliophile (Bane Of Book Rustlers), Yahoo Id DrakBibliophile
*
Sometimes The Dragon Wins! (That's why there are still Dragons Around)
[Polite Dragon Smile]
* >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 13, 2005 Posts: 353
|
(Msg. 37) Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Paul Howard wrote:
> I'd note that it is possible that there will be enough similarity between
> other worlds' plants and animals that Humans *could* eat those plants and
> animals.
And vice versa.
> We just haven't surveyed enough alien ecologies to know for sure.
If we could just get off this rock.
Heinlein did no favors with his tales of colonies revolting against
Earth (or their parent countries). Few politicians are going to help
such a colony get established. >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 13, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 38) Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Offbreed" <offbreed_106 DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:N42dnQOkld69atLYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@scnresearch.com...
> John Palmer wrote:
>
>
>> Two responses, first is given how undeveloped most of the planet is, and
>> how
>> dangerous the planet's surface is reputed to be, couldn't the treecats
>> disappear
>> into the "brush"?
>
> Likely they could.
>
>> and second, I was asking about specifics. What was on the planetary
>> surface that
>> was so inimical to humanity (or atleast human slave harvesters which is
>> not the
>> same thing at all).
>
> You ever work in 110F at 100% relative humidity?
>
> At night. When it's cooler?
No and there are a few places on earth where that would seem cool.
Fortunately they don't have that level of humidity.
If the air pressure is a little high and extra humid...People might find
things mildew including them.
My understanding was that as soon as the government changed hands ways were
developed to bring the death rate down to something sane.
Please note that this strongly suggests that Mesa didn't care to fully
develop the planet which more or less boggles my feeble mind.
I keep hitting things like this and thinking what the bleep are these people
doing because they weren't developing their power base the way they should. >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 13, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 39) Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"gS49" <gersmith00.DeleteThis@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:vD04h.1250$2X4.535@trnddc04...
>
> "Jeffrey MacHott" <Raguleader.DeleteThis@netzero.net> wrote in message
> news:XiV3h.284843$aI2.223542@fe06.news.easynews.com...
>> Offbreed wrote:
>>> John Palmer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Two responses, first is given how undeveloped most of the planet is,
>>>> and how
>>>> dangerous the planet's surface is reputed to be, couldn't the treecats
>>>> disappear
>>>> into the "brush"?
>>>
>>> Likely they could.
>>>
>>
>> That's pretty much what they did on Sphinx for quite a while,
>> successfully hiding there mere existence from space-faring humans for
>> quite a while. I'm not sure how widespread the knowledge of their ability
>> to see Infrared light is though.
>>
>
> Although on Sphinx they were "disappearing" into their native habitat,
> where they were familiar with the conditions and could eat their
> ecological neighbors without problem. Doing the same on a different
> planet would be problematic to impossible because of biochemical
> differences, lacking micronutrients, or toxic substances. The Graysonites
> needed severe techonological intervention just to cut the death rate to
> 75% (or whatever) from 100%. Taking to the bush without extensive
> preparation by genetic manipulation to adapt to the new environment would
> not work unless the planet were essentially identical to the homeworld.
>
> gS
>
>
The geology could be different and so could the climate. It is the basic
biochemestry that matters. DW has added a few more the crops and live stock
had to be adjusted to live on this planet before the humans could thrive
statements. On the other hand a percentage of planets don't seem to have had
this problem to the degree of preventing settlement even without
bioengineers. >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 25, 2004 Posts: 440
|
(Msg. 40) Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 12:11 am
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
deowll wrote:
> "Offbreed" <offbreed_106.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:N42dnQOkld69atLYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@scnresearch.com...
>> John Palmer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Two responses, first is given how undeveloped most of the planet is, and
>>> how
>>> dangerous the planet's surface is reputed to be, couldn't the treecats
>>> disappear
>>> into the "brush"?
>> Likely they could.
>>
>>> and second, I was asking about specifics. What was on the planetary
>>> surface that
>>> was so inimical to humanity (or atleast human slave harvesters which is
>>> not the
>>> same thing at all).
>> You ever work in 110F at 100% relative humidity?
>>
>> At night. When it's cooler?
>
> No and there are a few places on earth where that would seem cool.
> Fortunately they don't have that level of humidity.
Say, how cold do rainforests get at night? I've heard that in most
deserts, you often need a coat at nighttime, since the lack of moisture
in the air allows all the heat accumulated during the day to escape easily.
--
--Jeffrey MacHott
"Sola bona lingua est mortua lingua" >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 13, 2005 Posts: 353
|
(Msg. 41) Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 12:11 am
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Jeffrey MacHott wrote:
> Say, how cold do rainforests get at night? I've heard that in most
> deserts, you often need a coat at nighttime, since the lack of moisture
> in the air allows all the heat accumulated during the day to escape easily.
Here in SE Alaska, temperate rain forest, the day/night temperature
spread is about 10F when we have a heavy cloud cover and drizzle, back
in the woods. Winter and summer.
The temperature spread is greater in town, at airports, and on the
beach, maybe 15F.
I think we want someone with experience "in country" to comment on
tropical rain forests. They sleep in hammocks for more reasons than the
creepy crawlies, though. >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 53
|
(Msg. 42) Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Offbreed wrote:
> Paul Howard wrote:
>> We just haven't surveyed enough alien ecologies to know for sure.
>
> If we could just get off this rock.
>
> Heinlein did no favors with his tales of colonies revolting against
> Earth (or their parent countries). Few politicians are going to help
> such a colony get established.
Well, duh, what do they expect? Anyone notice how the old overseas
colonies did that too, for the most part...
Politicians will do whatever they feel their supporters would like.
--
Mikko Nahkola <mnahkola.RemoveThis@trein.ntc.nokia.com>
#include <disclaimer.h>
#Not speaking for my employer. No warranty. YMMV. >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 26, 2003 Posts: 296
|
(Msg. 43) Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:45 am
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but "deowll" <deowll DeleteThis @bellsouth.net>
wrote on Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:39:14 -0600 in alt.books.david-weber :
>
>>>Just speculation but a "galaxy" war seems on the horizon.
>>
>> Can you say warlordism, as various sector governors offer "their skills
>> and services in these times of trouble"?
>
>You are thinking Mercs for hire. The sector governors already have small or
>not so small empires that they will want to claim and expand.
Actually, I'm thinking of sector and planet governors holding their own
turf, and any other turf that they can also hold, "merely as an
intermediate expedient solution during this current crisis." I doubt any
will be so blatant as to come out and publicly say "I'm carving my own
empire out of the carcass of the Solarian League, and to those who think I
shouldn't I say 'You and what army?'"; but rather will dress it in fine
verbiage. Yada, yada, yada. I doubt very many people on most planets would
even notice in their lives, a change at the league level.
>Looking forward to reading about it if I don't die of old age first.
Yeah.
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough! >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 13, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 44) Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jeffrey MacHott" <Raguleader.TakeThisOut@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:Kg94h.270167$p86.230104@fe05.news.easynews.com...
> deowll wrote:
>> "Offbreed" <offbreed_106.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:N42dnQOkld69atLYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@scnresearch.com...
>>> John Palmer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Two responses, first is given how undeveloped most of the planet is,
>>>> and how
>>>> dangerous the planet's surface is reputed to be, couldn't the treecats
>>>> disappear
>>>> into the "brush"?
>>> Likely they could.
>>>
>>>> and second, I was asking about specifics. What was on the planetary
>>>> surface that
>>>> was so inimical to humanity (or atleast human slave harvesters which is
>>>> not the
>>>> same thing at all).
>>> You ever work in 110F at 100% relative humidity?
>>>
>>> At night. When it's cooler?
>>
>> No and there are a few places on earth where that would seem cool.
>> Fortunately they don't have that level of humidity.
>
> Say, how cold do rainforests get at night? I've heard that in most
> deserts, you often need a coat at nighttime, since the lack of moisture in
> the air allows all the heat accumulated during the day to escape easily.
>
Humid and over cast and it may not drop much. The trees themselves...
However any planet that is habitable is going to have many biomes. Planet
wide same climate does not compute unless you have something like Venus and
that world does not support life.
>
> --
> --Jeffrey MacHott
>
> "Sola bona lingua est mortua lingua" >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 13, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 45) Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Idle Speculation [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"pyotr filipivich" <phamp DeleteThis @mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:hvf3l2prno68d47o564f6vkl7295qtg8df@4ax.com...
> Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but "deowll" <deowll DeleteThis @bellsouth.net>
> wrote on Fri, 3 Nov 2006 22:39:14 -0600 in alt.books.david-weber :
>>
>>>>Just speculation but a "galaxy" war seems on the horizon.
>>>
>>> Can you say warlordism, as various sector governors offer "their skills
>>> and services in these times of trouble"?
>>
>>You are thinking Mercs for hire. The sector governors already have small
>>or
>>not so small empires that they will want to claim and expand.
>
> Actually, I'm thinking of sector and planet governors holding their own
> turf, and any other turf that they can also hold, "merely as an
> intermediate expedient solution during this current crisis." I doubt any
> will be so blatant as to come out and publicly say "I'm carving my own
> empire out of the carcass of the Solarian League, and to those who think I
> shouldn't I say 'You and what army?'"; but rather will dress it in fine
> verbiage. Yada, yada, yada. I doubt very many people on most planets
> would
> even notice in their lives, a change at the league level.
I suspect that many Legaue systems are as dependant on trade with each other
as we are with other nations. When trade stops commerce stops and the
economy goes into a nose dive. Following that modal many vital products may
not even be made in some systems. I also get the impression that lot of not
super rich people are able to get around quite a bit.
People notice their wallets are empty and they can't get products they need.
>
>>Looking forward to reading about it if I don't die of old age first.
>
> Yeah.
>
> pyotr
> --
> pyotr filipivich
> We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
> It's eight fifty eight. Close enough! >> Stay informed about: Idle Speculation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|