Hmmm...
You know, that as time goes by, the author changes and the kind of work
being written changes?
Niven wrote Mote a long time ago. It suffers from issues with
characterisation, which get written off as being very weak, when in fact
their is an archaic style to it that just isn't popular anymore. Mote is a
book about ideas. Moat, however, is a weaker sequal, because it involves a
rewriting of the canon, meaning that everything you know is now wrong. Its
an easy book to dislike for that reason.
I liked Destiny's Road, cos it was annoying and long. It wasn't the happy
egocentric book where the heroes solve everything. Instead, the first
colonists, who had become isolated citizens with their own (quite unpopular)
mores, had to have a very weak hero struggle through the challenges of a
much more modern culture. Imagine a third world person visiting a first
world country to seek resources that we popularly would deny them. I see an
appeal in the hero meeting that challenge, even though it takes forty years
to do it.
Inferno. Inferno is beautifully wicked. Remember the noughts and crosses
game?
Cheers,
Juz
>> Stay informed about: Inferno