sebi wrote:
> it's getting discussy now, great
[snip]
>> <Top-posting corrected>
A: Because it puts elements of discussion in a harder to read order.
Q: Why is top posting considered non-optimal?
(Also, you tend to forget that by adding a little comment at the top
that there's a lot of >>>-nested stuff beneath that you could have
snipped. Not that there was much previous snipping in that thread
anyway.
As someone fairly new to ABP (though I notice a couple of years using
Usenet via Google Groups, mostly on another fan-type forum) I just
thought I'd let you know. Google's interface is godawful for getting
things like this wrong, it seems, as well as doing terrible things to
the tags (the "[M]" for "Meta-Discussion" thing I have up there in the
subject line) that forces us non-Googlers to make allowances.
It's quite possible you don't realise what you're doing, or the
difference from group standard. So I thought I'd expand on the previous
hint that one of our other regulars posted.
Anyway, I'm not in any way an 'authority' on this group, but Hello
anyway. I hope you do like our discussions (we tend to have a number of
them) and feel free to continue contributing anything you consider to be
of value.