On 5 Feb 2008 06:25:22 GMT, Dan McEwen wrote:
>grinningdemon wrote in
>
>
>> On 4 Feb 2008 23:40:08 GMT, Dan McEwen wrote:
>>
>>>Billy Bissette wrote in
>>>
>>>
>>>> The locket made me think it might be Rachel for some reason,
>>>> particularly with Rachel's ties to Cable's timeline. Besides, why
>>>> would new baby Jean have Jean's locket?
>>>
>>>I thought Rachel, too, but she doesn't make much sense. We already
>>>have a Rachel. The only way it could work at all is if Jean was
>>>somehow pregnant when she died and managed to return just to give
>>>birth.
>>
>> Would that really be any stranger than Cable being born from Jean's
>> evil clone who also died and came back a couple times?
>
>Yes, because Maddie wasn't evil when she gave birth.
>No, seriously, a living clone is significantly different from a person
>who returned from the dead just to give birth to her daughter.
Different, yes, but less strange? That family is known for it's weird
origins...Nate Grey and Stryfe werel test-tube babies...Vulcan was cut
out of the womb and had his aging accelerated...depending on who you
talk to, Rachel was an immaculate conception...hell, the Summers
family line started from an orphan kid who decided to name himself
Summers after a time-traveling Cyclops whom he first met naked in a
sewer...I think anything's possible at this point...and clones are
about as common place as resurrections where the X-Men are concerned
so...