Missing Book ??

"Mike Bourke" <mbou3355 DeleteThis @bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:VRlri.14006$4A1.10359@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Just because Marvel have been licenced to do a comic adaption of Magician
> (and possibly the other Midkemia novels), doesn't mean that they have
> licenced the rights to adapting the works into another medium, ie TV or
> Cinema.
>
> Mike Bourke
>

Really? I never made the connection. Thank you, Mr. Obvious.


> "Bajori" <bajori1970 DeleteThis @cbj.com> wrote in message
> news:OAqqi.146114$LL7.88072@fe08.news.easynews.com...
>>
>> "guig" <guig DeleteThis @yerawathame.com> wrote in message
>> news:2007072706523316807-guig@yerawathamecom...
>> > On 2007-07-26 03:22:58 +0100, Raymond Feist
> <raymond DeleteThis @nospam.bittersea.com>
>> > said:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> As far as you're disappointment with such, I can appreciate having a
>> >> preference for one media form over another. I tend to be a little
>> >> more
>> >> interested in seeing what other people can do, which is why I am
>> >> pretty
>> >> happy with the comic adaptation Marvel's doing of Magician. On the
> other
>> >> hand, I certainly can see why some people don't wish to bother; it
>> >> runs
>> >> counter to what they've created in their own heads.
>> >>
>> >> Best, R.E.F.
>> >
>> > Marvel doing Magician? Eh? When did that happen? That mean they're
>> > going
>> > to pass it onto the movie industry next
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I don't see it ever occuring as a major motion picture, but I think the
>> first Riftwar would make a fine Sci-Fi mini-series.
>>
>
>

Obvious to you and me, but from "guig" 's comment it wasn't necessarily
obvious to him or her.

Mike

"Bajori" <bajori1970.TakeThisOut@cbj.com> wrote in message
news:rhmri.307847$qT.160220@fe06.news.easynews.com...
>
> "Mike Bourke" <mbou3355.TakeThisOut@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:VRlri.14006$4A1.10359@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > Just because Marvel have been licenced to do a comic adaption of
Magician
> > (and possibly the other Midkemia novels), doesn't mean that they have
> > licenced the rights to adapting the works into another medium, ie TV or
> > Cinema.
> >
> > Mike Bourke
> >
>
> Really? I never made the connection. Thank you, Mr. Obvious.
>
>
> > "Bajori" <bajori1970.TakeThisOut@cbj.com> wrote in message
> > news:OAqqi.146114$LL7.88072@fe08.news.easynews.com...
> >>
> >> "guig" <guig.TakeThisOut@yerawathame.com> wrote in message
> >> news:2007072706523316807-guig@yerawathamecom...
> >> > On 2007-07-26 03:22:58 +0100, Raymond Feist
> > <raymond.TakeThisOut@nospam.bittersea.com>
> >> > said:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> As far as you're disappointment with such, I can appreciate having a
> >> >> preference for one media form over another. I tend to be a little
> >> >> more
> >> >> interested in seeing what other people can do, which is why I am
> >> >> pretty
> >> >> happy with the comic adaptation Marvel's doing of Magician. On the
> > other
> >> >> hand, I certainly can see why some people don't wish to bother; it
> >> >> runs
> >> >> counter to what they've created in their own heads.
> >> >>
> >> >> Best, R.E.F.
> >> >
> >> > Marvel doing Magician? Eh? When did that happen? That mean they're
> >> > going
> >> > to pass it onto the movie industry next
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't see it ever occuring as a major motion picture, but I think the
> >> first Riftwar would make a fine Sci-Fi mini-series.
> >>
> >
> >
>