Welcome to BookForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

What was Sauron thinking?

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
   Book Forums (Home) -> J.R.R. Tolkien RSS
Next:  'JRRT Architect of Middle Earth' question  
Author Message
Larry Swain

External


Since: Aug 28, 2007
Posts: 55



(Msg. 46) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:04 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien (more info?)

Glenn Holliday wrote:
> Francis A. Miniter wrote:
>
>> What Sauron could not and would not think was that anyone would
>> attempt to destroy the One Ring. ...
>>
>> To quote from The Princess Bride, "It is inconceivable!"
>
>
> In Sauron's case, the reply is probably also appropriate.
> And I'm probably misquoting: "I don't think that word means
> what you think it means."
>
> It's hard to reconcile Sauron's intelligence with such a
> total blindness in this area. But that's the way Tolkien
> wrote him.
>

Really? I disagree. Intelligent people often have such confidence in
their own analyses of a situation that they can not consider other
possiblities. Sauron also probably did not have a set of advisors who
could give him another viewpoint to listen to.

He knew that his enemies knew that his armies were powerful enough to
overwhelm them all, and that even combined they could not hope to win.
The only they could win was by using the Ring. Even should they
conceive of destroying the Ring, the Ring's nature and gift of self
preservation was such that only a being of incredible will could resist
its pull (see Isildur, Gandalf, Galadriel, Frodo...), and if Aragorn now
had it, he was but mortal and of Isildur's line--doughty and mighty,
yes, but like his ancestor likely unable to part with the Ring. And
even if they should, they would certainly not entrust it to a hobbit,
and he had all holes into his realm covered.....how possibly could two
spies at Cirith Ungol possibly be carrying the Ring?

Remember: the plan to destroy the Ring was always called a fool's
errand, that the Wise had always to this point not taken that road, and
the plan all but failed at the Cracks but for a eucatastrophe almost
from beyond the circles of the world.

 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Öjevind_Lång

External


Since: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 4



(Msg. 47) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:12 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"John W Kennedy" <jwkenne.RemoveThis@attglobal.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:488bf68a$0$7341$607ed4bc@cv.net...

[snip]

>> Sauron was of the Maiar, too. That doesn't seem enough reason to let him
>> use the Palantir
>
> The Stewards of Gondor, to a man, knew that Sauron was evil. They did not
> know about Saruman.

But it came as a surprise to Gandalf that Saruman had a palantír. Gandalf
had been to Gondor more than once, and I can't think of any reason why the
circumstance that Saruman had been entrusted with a palantír would have been
withheld from him.

Öjevind

 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Emma Pease

External


Since: Jul 05, 2008
Posts: 3



(Msg. 48) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:12 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2008-07-27, Öjevind Lång <bredband.net DeleteThis @ojevind.lang> wrote:
> "John W Kennedy" <jwkenne DeleteThis @attglobal.net> skrev i meddelandet
> news:488bf68a$0$7341$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Sauron was of the Maiar, too. That doesn't seem enough reason to let him
>>> use the Palantir
>>
>> The Stewards of Gondor, to a man, knew that Sauron was evil. They did not
>> know about Saruman.
>
> But it came as a surprise to Gandalf that Saruman had a palantír. Gandalf
> had been to Gondor more than once, and I can't think of any reason why the
> circumstance that Saruman had been entrusted with a palantír would have been
> withheld from him.

I suspect the palantiri had been forgotten about except by people who were
actively looking for objects (such as Saruman) or who were responsible for
them (such as Denethor). Gandalf's area of study had not been Gondor or
objects. Knowing where the stones were was something he might never had
learned or thought important (it was Saruman's responsibility to report on
possibly useful objects as well as ring lore and Gandalf was probably
content with that until too late). After Saruman's treason had become
apparent, Gandalf never visited Minas Tirith, the one place that might
have had a list of Orthanc's contents, until the palantir had been
revealed. If Boromir had been more of a student of lore (like his brother
and father), he might have known about the Orthanc palantir and been able
to tell during the prep for the trip from Rivendell, but, I very much
doubt he knew anything about the contents of Orthanc except that Saruman
was there.

Remember there were probably other objects of wonder in Orthanc (and Minas
Tirith) that the readers never learned about because they had no relevance
to the plot.


--
\----
|\* | Emma Pease Net Spinster
|_\/ Die Luft der Freiheit weht
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
John W Kennedy

External


Since: Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 14



(Msg. 49) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:12 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Öjevind Lång wrote:
> "John W Kennedy" <jwkenne RemoveThis @attglobal.net> skrev i meddelandet
> news:488bf68a$0$7341$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Sauron was of the Maiar, too. That doesn't seem enough reason to let
>>> him
>>> use the Palantir
>>
>> The Stewards of Gondor, to a man, knew that Sauron was evil. They did
>> not know about Saruman.
>
> But it came as a surprise to Gandalf that Saruman had a palantír.
> Gandalf had been to Gondor more than once, and I can't think of any
> reason why the circumstance that Saruman had been entrusted with a
> palantír would have been withheld from him.

There is no evidence that Gandalf ever searched the archives of Gondor
for information on either subject.

--
John W. Kennedy
"The first effect of not believing in God is to believe in anything...."
-- Emile Cammaerts, "The Laughing Prophet"
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
troels2

External


Since: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 372



(Msg. 50) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:45 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In message <news:MPG.22f55323b419000098b744@news.individual.net>
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown.TakeThisOut@fastmail.fm> spoke these staves:
>
> In our world, a glowing sword would be magic, but not in Middle-
> earth. There, it's just how things work, like bread that doesn't
> go stale as long as it's wrapped in leaves.

It is part of what Tolkien describes in letter #131 when he says that
I have not used 'magic' consistently, and indeed the
Elven-queen Galadriel is obliged to remonstrate with the
Hobbits on their confused use of the word both for the
devices and operations of the Enemy, and for those of the
Elves. I have not, because there is not a word for the
latter (since all human stories have suffered the same
confusion). But the Elves are there (in my tales) to
demonstrate the difference. Their 'magic' is Art,
delivered from many of its human limitations: more
effortless, more quick, more complete (product, and
vision in unflawed correspondence). And its object is Art
not Power, sub-creation not domination and tyrannous re-
forming of Creation.
[Letters #131, to Milton Waldman, ?late 1951]

It is illustrated in the book by Pippin's question in Lothlórien,
'Are these magic cloaks?' he asked of the Elves, but they didn't
understand the question, answering that 'They are elvish robes
certainly, if that is what you mean.'

Though it is not all parts of the elvish 'magic' (for lack of a
better word) that are, in actual fact, pure art[$], there is still
this difference. To Pippin, Sting is doubtlessly a 'magic sword', but
to the Elves it is an elvish sword. The Hobbits here represent the
human view (though possibly the Númenóreans had learned the elvish
view), and of course they also represent the outlook of the reader.

In any usual sense of the word, these elvish qualities are indeed
'magic', but Tolkien makes a point in distinguishing different kinds
of magic in terms of both purpose and means[#]. Being human I find it
natural to subscribe to the human view and call these qualities
magic, though I agree that it's important to distinguish the 'magic'
of Sting from the magic of the barrow-blades that were 'work of
Westernesse, wound about with spells for the bane of Mordor.'

[$] Many of the elvish abilities are quite functionalistic -- such as
both the warning of the swords, the camouflage ability of the cloaks,
and the auto-untie function of the rope. And then there is the other
stuff -- the songs and rings of power, for instance, where the elvish
magic becomes magic in the more usual sense.

[#] By 'means', I think of the difference between the magic achieved
inherently and, more importantlhy, without deliberation, as 'Art' --
an immanent aspect of elvish craftmanship; and then the other kind of
magic that requires spells, songs of power, evil spirits etc.

--
Troels Forchhammer
Valid e-mail is <troelsfo(a)gmail.com>
Please put [AFT], [RABT] or 'Tolkien' in subject.

Smile
a while
ere day
is done
and all
your gall
will soon
be gone.
- Piet Hein, /Advice at Nightfall/
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
news45

External


Since: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 263



(Msg. 51) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:49 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

John W Kennedy wrote:

> Derek Broughton wrote:
>> John W Kennedy wrote:
>>
>>> Öjevind Lång wrote:

>>>> As I recall, no one thought of the fact that there was still a palantír
>>>> in Orthanc when Saruman was given the keys to it. I believe that if the
>>>> Steward of Gondor hade remembered it, he would have removed the stone.
>>> Not if he knew that Saruman was of the Maiar.
>>
>> Sauron was of the Maiar, too. That doesn't seem enough reason to let him
>> use the Palantir
>
> The Stewards of Gondor, to a man, knew that Sauron was evil. They did
> not know about Saruman.

If you'd said Saruman was of the Istari, I'd have agreed, but the fact that
he's a Maia doesn't cut it.
--
derek
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Öjevind_Lång

External


Since: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 4



(Msg. 52) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:52 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Derek Broughton" <news DeleteThis @pointerstop.ca> skrev i meddelandet
news:8647308.S46Lx9SrLH@cedar.serverforest.com...
> Öjevind Lång wrote:

[snip]

>>> Sting had "sufficiently advanced technology" (which is
>>> indistinguishable from magic) to emit blue photons
>>> in the presence of orcs.
>>
>> Do I detect a fellow "Civilization" addict?
>
> It's simply Clarke's Law, coined long before Civilization (the game, not
> the
> social structure).

Oh, I know it's Clarke's Law (or one of them), but it is quoted in
"Civilization".

Öjevind
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
amorphous999

External


Since: Jul 23, 2008
Posts: 8



(Msg. 53) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 2:14 am
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Larry Swain <giles DeleteThis @poetic.com> wrote in
news:QfWdnZcxwbUSNxHVnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@comcast.com:

> Glenn Holliday wrote:
>> Francis A. Miniter wrote:
>>
>>> What Sauron could not and would not think was that anyone would
>>> attempt to destroy the One Ring. ...
>>>
>>> To quote from The Princess Bride, "It is inconceivable!"
>>
>>
>> In Sauron's case, the reply is probably also appropriate.
>> And I'm probably misquoting: "I don't think that word means
>> what you think it means."
>>
>> It's hard to reconcile Sauron's intelligence with such a
>> total blindness in this area. But that's the way Tolkien
>> wrote him.
>>
>
> Really? I disagree. Intelligent people often have such confidence in
> their own analyses of a situation that they can not consider other
> possiblities. Sauron also probably did not have a set of advisors who
> could give him another viewpoint to listen to.
>
> He knew that his enemies knew that his armies were powerful enough to
> overwhelm them all, and that even combined they could not hope to
win.
> The only they could win was by using the Ring. Even should they
> conceive of destroying the Ring, the Ring's nature and gift of self
> preservation was such that only a being of incredible will could
resist
> its pull (see Isildur, Gandalf, Galadriel, Frodo...), and if Aragorn
now
> had it, he was but mortal and of Isildur's line--doughty and mighty,
> yes, but like his ancestor likely unable to part with the Ring. And
> even if they should, they would certainly not entrust it to a hobbit,
> and he had all holes into his realm covered.....how possibly could two
> spies at Cirith Ungol possibly be carrying the Ring?
>
> Remember: the plan to destroy the Ring was always called a fool's
> errand, that the Wise had always to this point not taken that road,
and
> the plan all but failed at the Cracks but for a eucatastrophe almost
> from beyond the circles of the world.

This is the best explanation I've heard. Sauron probably did not have
advisors; he had synchophants instead. The basic point I've been
maintaining all along is that if Sauron really spent time investigating
what happened at Cirith Ungol, he would have put more resources into
figuring out what happened, and pursuing Frodo, Sam, and Gollum because
the incident didn't make sense.

Also, of course in the end Frodo's quest to destroy the Ring did fail
because Frodo was unable to throw the Ring into the Fire. He was
rescued by Gollum. I'm not suure what Tolkien's point was here. Maybe
it was: Do the right thing, make the hard but correct choices, and Eru
will provide.

I remember a long thread called "Denethor was Right" on this very
issue. Maybe Sauron't thinking was the same as Denethor's: Frodo's
quest was impossible.

amorphous
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Thomas Koenig

External


Since: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 3



(Msg. 54) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:33 am
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2008-07-28, Öjevind Lång <bredband.net.TakeThisOut@ojevind.lang> wrote:

> I think this is all of a piece with the claims that there is nothing odd
> about Gandalf apparently having no idea who Boromir is when Boromir turns up
> at the Council of Elrond.

Gandalf was _very_ good at what not to say, and when not to say it.
This might be one example.
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
John W Kennedy

External


Since: Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 14



(Msg. 55) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:14 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Derek Broughton wrote:
> John W Kennedy wrote:
>
>> Derek Broughton wrote:
>>> John W Kennedy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Öjevind Lång wrote:
>
>>>>> As I recall, no one thought of the fact that there was still a palantír
>>>>> in Orthanc when Saruman was given the keys to it. I believe that if the
>>>>> Steward of Gondor hade remembered it, he would have removed the stone.
>>>> Not if he knew that Saruman was of the Maiar.
>>> Sauron was of the Maiar, too. That doesn't seem enough reason to let him
>>> use the Palantir
>> The Stewards of Gondor, to a man, knew that Sauron was evil. They did
>> not know about Saruman.
>
> If you'd said Saruman was of the Istari, I'd have agreed, but the fact that
> he's a Maia doesn't cut it.

You're saying that a Steward of Gondor is more impressed by a wizard
than by a low-level god?


--
John W. Kennedy
"...if you had to fall in love with someone who was evil, I can see
why it was her."
-- "Alias"
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Öjevind_Lång

External


Since: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 4



(Msg. 56) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:57 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien, others (more info?)

"John W Kennedy" <jwkenne DeleteThis @attglobal.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:488ce640$0$5010$607ed4bc@cv.net...

[snip]

>> But it came as a surprise to Gandalf that Saruman had a palantír. Gandalf
>> had been to Gondor more than once, and I can't think of any reason why
>> the circumstance that Saruman had been entrusted with a palantír would
>> have been withheld from him.
>
> There is no evidence that Gandalf ever searched the archives of Gondor for
> information on either subject.

But on the ride to Gondor, he tells Pippin about the seven stones. He knows
where they had originally been located; he mentions that too. Absent any
information that the Orthanc stone had been removed, he should have presumed
that it was still there.
I think this is all of a piece with the claims that there is nothing odd
about Gandalf apparently having no idea who Boromir is when Boromir turns up
at the Council of Elrond. Denethor and his sons were major players, and
Gandalf had been to Gondor several times. o fopcurse he must have known who
Boromir was.
IOW, Tolkien sometimes messed up. We all do.

Öjevind
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
the_stan_brown

External


Since: Jan 01, 2004
Posts: 626



(Msg. 57) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:57 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:57:57 +0200 from Öjevind Lång
<bredband.net.DeleteThis@ojevind.lang>:
> But on the ride to Gondor, he tells Pippin about the seven stones. He knows
> where they had originally been located; he mentions that too. Absent any
> information that the Orthanc stone had been removed, he should have presumed
> that it was still there.

Really? Remember that it had been put there three thousand years
earlier, and had not been used for many lifetimes. It seems much more
likely that it had not been used because it had been moved and lost.
Even when Gandalf *saw* the Palantír, he did not recognize it. After
leaving Isengard, he tells Merry, "There was some link between
Isengard and Mordor, which I have not yet fathomed. How they
exchanged news I am not sure; but they did so."

I think that is quite reasonable, that he did not *expect* it to be
there. And when not in use, a Palantír is not exactly recognizable.

> I think this is all of a piece with the claims that there is
> nothing odd about Gandalf apparently having no idea who Boromir is
> when Boromir turns up at the Council of Elrond. Denethor and his
> sons were major players, and Gandalf had been to Gondor several
> times. o fopcurse he must have known who Boromir was.

Do we definitely know that Gandalf had no idea who Boromir was? But
if he didn't, is that so unbelievable? As an adult, Boromir was
almost constantly campaigning and so maybe he was never at Minas
Tirith at the same time as Gandalf.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com
Tolkien FAQs: http://Tolkien.slimy.com (Steuard Jensen's site)
Tolkien letters FAQ:
http://mysite.verizon.net/aznirb/mtr/lettersfaq.html
FAQ of the Rings: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/ringfaq.htm
Encyclopedia of Arda: http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/default.htm
more FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Raven

External


Since: May 08, 2007
Posts: 40



(Msg. 58) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:17 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>arts>books>tolkien (more info?)

"Troels Forchhammer" <Troels.RemoveThis@ThisIsFake.invalid> skrev i meddelelsen
news:Xns9AE8DD415EC74T.Forch@130.133.1.4...

> [$] Many of the elvish abilities are quite functionalistic -- such as
> both the warning of the swords, the camouflage ability of the cloaks,
> and the auto-untie function of the rope. And then there is the other
> stuff -- the songs and rings of power, for instance, where the elvish
> magic becomes magic in the more usual sense.

> [#] By 'means', I think of the difference between the magic achieved
> inherently and, more importantlhy, without deliberation, as 'Art' --
> an immanent aspect of elvish craftmanship; and then the other kind of
> magic that requires spells, songs of power, evil spirits etc.

(Back from two weeks of hard work at Green Concert, and to my delight
seeing an actual Tolkien discussion, like in the old days.)

It seems to me that part of this Elvish magic was the art of imbuing will
into the things they made. This did not require that they imbue sentience
into them. Not only the Elves could do so; Sauron imbued his will into the
Ring, and in its unsentient way it always worked towards evil.
Technology is the art of making and using tools. These tools work
because the makers know the physical properties of the materials used in
them and have the wit and skill to use this. The plough turns and loosens
the topsoil for essentially the same reason that the apple falls downwards:
both follow the patterns followed by all the matter of the Universe, known
as Laws of Nature.
But in my guess, in Tolkien's subcreation, the rope of Lórien untied
itself at the opportune moment because it had the will to serve. At least
it had the will to serve legitimate users; it is anyone's guess if it would
have been as helpful to, say, a Man in the service of Sauron had he stolen
the rope and used it. The will of Sauron was so strong that he could have
broken that of the rope and turned it into his service had he seen some use
in it...
The cloaks had the will to protect both from cold and from heat
apparently beyond the thermodynamic properties of the cloth, and the will to
conceal the wearers from unfriendly eyes. Gurthang was imbued by the ill
will of its maker Eöl, and to this is attributed in part the occasional ill
uses of it; it was not a lucky sword although certainly a mighty one.

Hræfn.
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
the_stan_brown

External


Since: Jan 01, 2004
Posts: 626



(Msg. 59) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:10 pm
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:14:07 -0400 from John W Kennedy
<jwkenne DeleteThis @attglobal.net>:
> Derek Broughton wrote:
> > If you'd said Saruman was of the Istari, I'd have agreed, but the
> > fact that he's a Maia doesn't cut it.
>
> You're saying that a Steward of Gondor is more impressed by a wizard
> than by a low-level god?

Nobody knew that the Istari were Maiar. In practical terms, they
*weren't* fully Maiar while they were in Middle-earth. They had
voluntarily given up much of their Maia nature because they were
forbidden to use force or demonstrations of power to overawe Elves,
Men, and Dwarves.

Gandalf, Saruman, and Sauron were originally beings of the same
order, but they had followed very different paths. Anyway, I'm not
sure the Stewards knew that Sauron was a Maia, much less that he and
the Wizards had the same origin.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com
Tolkien FAQs: http://Tolkien.slimy.com (Steuard Jensen's site)
Tolkien letters FAQ:
http://mysite.verizon.net/aznirb/mtr/lettersfaq.html
FAQ of the Rings: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/ringfaq.htm
Encyclopedia of Arda: http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/default.htm
more FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
troels2

External


Since: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 372



(Msg. 60) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:24 am
Post subject: Re: What was Sauron thinking? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I think that most of the concerns raised in this thread regarding the
Palantíri are actually addressed in the essay on the Palantíri in
/Unfinished Tales/. For obvious reasons I won't reproduce the entire
essay, but I will try to include enough to provide some answers.

III THE PALANTÍRI

The palantíri were no doubt never matters of common use
or common knowledge, even in Númenor. In Middle-earth they
were kept in guarded rooms, high in strong towers, only
kings and rulers, and their appointed wardens, had access
to them, [...]. But until the passing of the Kings they
were not sinister secrets. [...]. [1]
After the days of the Kings, and the loss of Minas Ithil,
there is no further mention of their open and official use.
There was no answering Stone left in the North after the
shipwreck of Arvedui Last-king in the year 1975.[2] In 2002
the Ithil-stone was lost. There then remained only the
Anor-stone in Minas Tirith and the Orthanc-stone.[3]
Two things contributed then to the neglect of the Stones,
and their passing out of the general memory of the people.
The first was ignorance of what had happened to the Ithil-
stone: [...]; but it was clearly possible that it bad been
seized and had come into the possession of Sauron, and some
of the wiser and more farseeing may have considered this.
It would appear that they did so, and realized that the
Stone would be of little use to him for the damage of
Gondor, unless it made contact with another Stone that was
in accord with it.[5] It was for this reason, it may be
supposed, that the Anor-stone, about which all the records
of the Stewards are silent until the War of the Ring, was
kept as a closely-guarded secret, accessible only to the
Ruling Stewards and never by them used (it seems) until
Denethor II.
The second reason was the decay of Gondor, and the waning
of interest in or knowledge of ancient history among all
but a few even of the high men of the realm, [...].
Communications depended on messengers and errand-riders, or
in times of urgency upon beacons, and if the Stones of Anor
and Orthanc were still guarded as treasures out of the
past, known to exist only by a few, the Seven Stones of old
were by the people generally forgotten, and the rhymes of
lore that spoke of them were if remembered no longer
understood; [...].
The Orthanc-stone appears to have been at this time long
disregarded by the Stewards: it was no longer of any use to
them, and was secure in its impregnable tower. [...].
Isengard remained a personal possession of the Stewards,
but Orthanc itself became deserted, and eventually it was
closed and its keys removed to Minas Tirith. If Beren the
Steward considered the Stone at all when he gave these to
Saruman, he probably thought that it could be in no safer
hands than those of the head of the Council opposed to
Sauron.
Saruman had no doubt from his investigations[6] gained a
special knowledge of the Stones, things that would attract
his attention, and had become convinced that the Orthanc-
stone was still intact in its tower. [...]. At that time
the matter of the Orthanc-stone would hardly concern the
White Council. Only Saruman, having gained the favour of
the Stewards, had yet made sufficient study of the records
of Gondor to perceive the interest of the palantíri and
the possible uses of those that survived; but of this he
said nothing to his colleagues. [...]. 7
The Council in general must independently have known of
the Stones and their ancient dispositions, but they did not
regard them as of much present importance: they were things
that belonged to the history of the Kingdoms of the
Dúnedain, marvellous and admirable, but mostly now lost or
rendered of little use. [...].
Though (warned by Gandalf) the Council may have begun to
doubt Saruman's designs as regarded the Rings, not even
Gandalf knew that he had become an ally, or servant, of
Sauron. This Gandalf only discovered in July 3018. But,
although Gandalf had in latter years enlarged his own and
the Council's knowledge of Gondor's history by study of its
documents, his and their chief concern was still with the
Ring: the possibilities latent in the Stones were not
realized. It is evident that at the time of the War of the
Ring the Council had not long become aware of the doubt
concerning the fate of the Ithil-stone, and failed
(understandably even in such persons as Elrond, Galadriel,
and Gandalf, under the weight of their cares) to appreciate
its significance, to consider what might be the result if
Sauron became possessed of one of the Stones, and anyone
else should then make use of another. It needed the
demonstration on Dol Baran of the effects of the Orthanc-
stone on Peregrin to reveal suddenly that the 'link'
between Isengard and Barad-dûr (seen to exist after it was
discovered that forces of Isengard had been joined with
others directed by Sauron in the attack on the Fellowship
at Parth Galen) was in fact the Orthanc-stone - and one
other palantír.
In his talk to Peregrin as they rode on Shadowfax from
Dol Baran (The Two Towers III 11) Gandalf's immediate
object was to give the Hobbit some idea of the history of
the palantíri, [...]. He was not concerned to exhibit his
own processes of discovery and deduction, except in its
last point: to explain how Sauron came to have control of
them, so that they were perilous for anyone, however
exalted, to use. But Gandalf's mind was at the same time
earnestly busy with the Stones, considering the bearings of
the revelation at Dol Baran upon many things that he had
observed and pondered: such as the wide knowledge of events
far away possessed by Denethor, and his appearance of
premature old age, first observable when he was not much
above sixty years old, although he belonged to a race and
family that still normally had longer lives than other men.
[...]. Gandalf's dealings with Denethor on arrival in Minas
Tirith, and in the following days, and all things that they
are reported to have said to one another, must be viewed in
the light of this doubt in Gandalf's mind.[8]
The importance of the palantir of Minas Tirith in his
thoughts thus dated only from Peregrin's experience on Dol
Baran. But his knowledge or guesses concerning its existence
were, of course, much earlier. [...].
But the Anor-stone had become a secret: no mention of its
fate after the fall of Minas Ithil appeared in any of the
annals or records of the Stewards. [...]. Gandalf should
have been reported as saying that he did not think that
Denethor had presumed to use it, until his wisdom failed.
He could not state it as a known fact, for when and why
Denethor had dared to use the Stone was and remains a
matter of conjecture. [...].
[...].
In the case of Denethor, the Steward was strengthened,
even against Sauron himself, by the fact the Stones were
far more amenable to legitimate users: most of all to true
'Heirs of Elendil' (as Aragorn), but also to one with
inherited authority (as Denethor), as compared to Saruman,
or Sauron. It may be noted that the effects were different.
Saruman fell under the domination of Sauron and desired his
victory, or no longer opposed it. Denethor remained
steadfast in his rejection Sauron, but was made to believe
that his victory was inevitable, and so fell into despair.
[...].


NOTES

[1] Doubtless they were used in the consultations between
Arnor and Gondor in the year 1944 concerning the succession
to the Crown. The "messages" received in Gondor in 1973,
telling of the dire straits of the Northern Kingdom, was
possibly their last use until the approach of the War of
the Ring. [Author's note.]
[2] With Arvedui were lost the Stones of Annúminas and Amon
Sûl (Weathertop). The third palantír of the North was that
in the tower Elostirion on Emyn Beraid, which had special
properties (see note 16).
[3] The Stone of Osgiliath had been lost in the waters of
Anduin in 1437, during the civil war of the Kin-strife.
[...]
[5] By themselves the Stones could only see: scenes or figures
in distant places, or in the past. These were without
explanation; and at any rate for men of later days it was
difficult to direct what visions should be revealed by the
will or desire of a surveyor. But when another mind
occupied a Stone in accord, thought could be 'transferred'
(received as 'speech'), and visions of the things in the
mind of the surveyor of one Stone could be seen by the
other surveyor. [...] [Author's note.]
[6] Cf. Gandalf's remarks to the Council of Elrond concerning
Saruman's long study of the scrolls and books of Minas
Tirith.
[...]
[8] Denethor was evidently aware of Gandalf's guesses and
suspicions, and at once both angered and sardonically
amused by them. Note his words to Gandalf at their meeting
in Minas Tirith (The Return of the King V 1): [...].


In message <news:slrng8pm2h.hbb.er_pease@hedge06.Stanford.EDU>
Emma Pease <er_pease.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> spoke these staves:
>
> On 2008-07-27, Öjevind Lång <bredband.net.RemoveThis@ojevind.lang> wrote:
>>
>> But it came as a surprise to Gandalf that Saruman had a palantír.
>> Gandalf had been to Gondor more than once, and I can't think of
>> any reason why the circumstance that Saruman had been entrusted
>> with a palantír would have been withheld from him.

I think the above addresses the reasons why the White Council had
been unaware of this. Whether we agree with Tolkien's assessment that
this oversight was understandable 'even in such persons as Elrond,
Galadriel, and Gandalf, under the weight of their cares' is, of
course, a different matter, though I'd be the last to blame others
for overlooking even important matters that aren't staring in your
eyes when one is busy with other matters (I've been down that road
too many times myself to blame others of it <GG>).

> I suspect the palantiri had been forgotten about except by people
> who were actively looking for objects (such as Saruman) or who
> were responsible for them (such as Denethor).

Precisely. I cut out a passage describing how the information gained
from the palantíri were, in later times, ascribed to some mystical
elvish powers of the Kings (these powers doubtlessly ascribed to
their being of Lúthien's line) just as the thing about their healing
hands. Apparently there was a good deal of mythologizing about the
Kings in Gondor during the reign of the Stewards.

> Gandalf's area of study had not been Gondor or objects.

Except, of course, as it pertained to Arnor or, in the period after
'The Hobbit', to the One Ring.

> Knowing where the stones were was something he might never had
> learned or thought important

And knowing where the stones had been kept a thousand years earlier
is not the same as knowing where they were now -- in particular as
some of the stones were well known to have been lost; a fate that
could reasonably be assumed to have befallen also the other stones
about which nothing was known.

> After Saruman's treason had become apparent, Gandalf never
> visited Minas Tirith,

Depending, of course, on how 'apparent' you mean Wink As the above
text explains, Gandalf did, in the last half-century or so before the
War of the Ring, go to Minas Tirith some two or three times and he
became the primary source of knowledge about that realm for the White
Council.

--
Troels Forchhammer
Valid e-mail is <troelsfo(a)gmail.com>
Please put [AFT], [RABT] or 'Tolkien' in subject.

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not
simpler.
- Albert Einstein
 >> Stay informed about: What was Sauron thinking? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
sauron - who is the master of sauron?

How much did Sauron know? - Would Sauron (or indeed any of the other Valar or Maiar) have had much recollection of his time before Arda? Presumably he would have met Illuvator, but would it be a clear recollection or a (Istari like) distant memory / vague recollection. Would he be....

How did Sauron do it... - In quiet moments I sometimes like thinking about the One Ring, and whether Tolkien had given much thought to how it worked. I like to think he did. How did Sauron bind all the other rings to the One Ring? I can understand how he did with those he had ...

Sauron Vs. Eonwe? - Ok even though this never happened in the story... If sauron had his ring. Who would win a duel Him or Eonwe? I would put my money on sauron 'cuz I remeber reading somewhere that he was the mightest of the Maia- and Eonwe is a Maia. Also because....

What would life under Sauron have been like? - Let's assume for a moment that Sauron had won the War of the Ring. Fast forward to modern times technologically; what's different? I mean almost anyone in office and many out of it craves controlling others and regulating their lives instead of leaving....
   Book Forums (Home) -> J.R.R. Tolkien All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Page 4 of 10

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]