|
Next: food fun -sbk
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:53 pm
Post subject: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access?
Imported from groups: alt>comp>software>financial>quickbooks (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 71
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 6:12 am
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:53 am
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:58 am
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 15, 2008
Posts: 10
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:58 am
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
qbuser DeleteThis @nospam.invalid wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:12:40 -0700 (PDT), QBConsultant
> <QBConsultant DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>> I've used WebEx and Logmein for remote access (both attended and
>> unattended access) and been very happy with both.
>
> I did a bit of further research mainly on the QB site.
>
> WebEx seems like a VNC type of application. Meaning, you remotely
> connect to a PC, run QB on the local PC and the remote PC just gets
> updates on its screen of what's on the local PC's monitor. In that
> case, the local PC can't be used at the same time.
>
> Do you or anyone else knows if it is at all possible to run Quickbooks
> on the remote PC but access only the data file remotely and
> concurrently with another user?
Windows Terminal Services. I believe now that is officially offered only for
USA Enterprise version.
> WebEx or any other similar available remote connection methods (many
> are even free like QNext or CrossLoop ) could work but in this case
> the date/time of remote access cannot be scheduled for when the local
> PC is unattended.
>
> Thanks for your help. >> Stay informed about: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<qbuser.TakeThisOut@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:qm9p84t48064n77erpvmd6rldnkp7pj6ni@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:12:40 -0700 (PDT), QBConsultant
> <QBConsultant.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>>
>>I've used WebEx and Logmein for remote access (both attended and
>>unattended access) and been very happy with both.
>
> I did a bit of further research mainly on the QB site.
>
> WebEx seems like a VNC type of application. Meaning, you remotely
> connect to a PC, run QB on the local PC and the remote PC just gets
> updates on its screen of what's on the local PC's monitor. In that
> case, the local PC can't be used at the same time.
>
> Do you or anyone else knows if it is at all possible to run Quickbooks
> on the remote PC but access only the data file remotely and
> concurrently with another user?
>
> WebEx or any other similar available remote connection methods (many
> are even free like QNext or CrossLoop ) could work but in this case
> the date/time of remote access cannot be scheduled for when the local
> PC is unattended.
>
> Thanks for your help.
The small investment in an additional workstation running QB and a service
like Logmein may be your most cost effective solution if only one remote
session is required. >> Stay informed about: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:47 am
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<qbuser.DeleteThis@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:mr6q84t86ses13gjnvegjrdocgbkrq50ji@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:13:41 -0400, "Haskel LaPort"
> <QBFanBoy.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>The small investment in an additional workstation running QB and a service
>>like Logmein may be your most cost effective solution if only one remote
>>session is required.
>
> Definite possibility. I may even try using VNC in that case, to avoid
> any third parties being part of the connection. Thanks for the
> suggestion.
It the involvement of the third party that makes the connection simple amd
reliable. There is a reason these companies are in business. >> Stay informed about: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 18, 2008
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:49 am
Post subject: Re: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<qbuser DeleteThis @nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:b1as84hkiivbu25cooltq8eqbo0u3lvvmm@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:47:25 -0400, "Haskel LaPort"
> <QBFanBoy DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It the involvement of the third party that makes the connection simple amd
>>reliable. There is a reason these companies are in business.
>
> Simpler than VNC, maybe, but highly insecure and heavily prone to
> abuse.
>
> The reason these companies are in business is the simplicity and
> usability factor that developers dismiss and ignore - somewhat similar
> to Intuit's approach in developing Quickbooks but people still use it
> because of lack of a decent alternative.
>
> Just because something is on the market doesn't mean it meets minimum
> criteria for quality and dependability. The end users' ignorance and
> computer illiteracy are a bigger factor for direct market
> manipulation.
Well it looks like I won't be selling you my bridge any time soon. I have
this sudden compulsion to wash your feet. >> Stay informed about: Any experience / feedback for QB Remote Access? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
